Fixed-scope review · DevOps
In about two weeks we review how code reaches production and which alerts would really fire, for teams running Docker on AWS, Azure or their own servers. You get a written report of the risks, ranked, and a 90-day plan to fix them.
Most teams we talk to suspect something is off in their release path or their monitoring, but cannot say what, or how much it matters. The Check answers that before anyone commits to a longer engagement. It is fixed in scope and price, it is read-only, and it ends with a plan you can carry out with us, with someone else, or on your own.
More on this side in deploy safety for Docker on VMs.
More on this side in observability for Docker on VMs.
Every item on the list is something we have found in production: a Swarm deploy that brought back the previous build with CI green; alert conditions watching metrics that did not exist; a real alarm that reached nobody; 95% of a manufacturer's monitoring tickets closing themselves. The studies below show what we found and the work that followed.
It is not a penetration test or a compliance audit, and it does not change anything in production. We do not promise a number of findings: if your release path and alerting are sound, the report says so and shows why.
Proof
Our own infrastructure
The alerting half of the Check, run on ourselves: two questions per condition found 3 of 7 dead and the one real alarm unrouted.
Read the case studyA global industrial manufacturer
The noise count: 30 days of tickets measured before anything changed.
Read the case studyA North American medical-device company
An engagement that started as a request for quick wins, with a read-only fleet audit and the previous-build fault found in the release path.
Read the case studyFAQ
Book a 30-minute scope call. We agree the scope and the fixed price before any work starts.